<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ReviewMe.com Sucks and Google Finally Gave Back Some Page Rank</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joetech.com/2008/01/12/reviewmecom-sucks-and-google-finally-give-back-some-page-rank/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joetech.com/2008/01/12/reviewmecom-sucks-and-google-finally-give-back-some-page-rank/</link>
	<description>Everything new in technology news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:35:46 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.joetech.com/2008/01/12/reviewmecom-sucks-and-google-finally-give-back-some-page-rank/comment-page-1/#comment-6781</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 18:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joetech.com/2008/01/12/reviewmecom-sucks-and-google-finally-give-back-some-page-rank/#comment-6781</guid>
		<description>maline: ExactRank doesn&#039;t show your Google page rank.  It is its own ranking system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maline: ExactRank doesn&#8217;t show your Google page rank.  It is its own ranking system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maline</title>
		<link>http://www.joetech.com/2008/01/12/reviewmecom-sucks-and-google-finally-give-back-some-page-rank/comment-page-1/#comment-6780</link>
		<dc:creator>maline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:15:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joetech.com/2008/01/12/reviewmecom-sucks-and-google-finally-give-back-some-page-rank/#comment-6780</guid>
		<description>i don&#039;t get it. I just noticed this afternoon on my google toolbar, my PR dropped from 3 to 0. But on my sidebar, i have a pagerank.net code which says i am 3. and now, I used up exactrank on your sidebar, and my site is PR4. ???

&lt;em&gt;maline&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.beautifulandhappy.com/2008/04/16/save-your-eyes/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Save your eyes&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i don&#8217;t get it. I just noticed this afternoon on my google toolbar, my PR dropped from 3 to 0. But on my sidebar, i have a pagerank.net code which says i am 3. and now, I used up exactrank on your sidebar, and my site is PR4. ???</p>
<p><em>maline&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.beautifulandhappy.com/2008/04/16/save-your-eyes/' rel="nofollow">Save your eyes</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MTT</title>
		<link>http://www.joetech.com/2008/01/12/reviewmecom-sucks-and-google-finally-give-back-some-page-rank/comment-page-1/#comment-5048</link>
		<dc:creator>MTT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Feb 2008 01:51:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joetech.com/2008/01/12/reviewmecom-sucks-and-google-finally-give-back-some-page-rank/#comment-5048</guid>
		<description>After submitting blog reviewMe shows no star-rank or price etc. So that i can start. Why so?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After submitting blog reviewMe shows no star-rank or price etc. So that i can start. Why so?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tech Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.joetech.com/2008/01/12/reviewmecom-sucks-and-google-finally-give-back-some-page-rank/comment-page-1/#comment-4748</link>
		<dc:creator>Tech Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 01:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joetech.com/2008/01/12/reviewmecom-sucks-and-google-finally-give-back-some-page-rank/#comment-4748</guid>
		<description>Page Rank, Google has slapped a few sites for selling links, although i somewhat agree with them as it manipulates their algo, are they right to say how one can earn money from their site, at the hands of Google, hmm, well, of course people will look to manipulate something, for profit.

&lt;em&gt;Tech Blog&#039;s last blog post..&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.hi-tech-it.com/2008/02/07/the-training-of-an-internet-virgin-how-to-learn-the-web-fast/&#039; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;The training of an Internet Virgin &#124; How to learn the web fast&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Page Rank, Google has slapped a few sites for selling links, although i somewhat agree with them as it manipulates their algo, are they right to say how one can earn money from their site, at the hands of Google, hmm, well, of course people will look to manipulate something, for profit.</p>
<p><em>Tech Blog&#8217;s last blog post..<a href='http://www.hi-tech-it.com/2008/02/07/the-training-of-an-internet-virgin-how-to-learn-the-web-fast/' rel="nofollow">The training of an Internet Virgin | How to learn the web fast</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pages tagged "rank"</title>
		<link>http://www.joetech.com/2008/01/12/reviewmecom-sucks-and-google-finally-give-back-some-page-rank/comment-page-1/#comment-3726</link>
		<dc:creator>Pages tagged "rank"</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 15:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joetech.com/2008/01/12/reviewmecom-sucks-and-google-finally-give-back-some-page-rank/#comment-3726</guid>
		<description>[...] bookmarks tagged rank ReviewMe.com Sucks and Google Finally Gave Back So...&#160;saved by 1 others  &#160;&#160;&#160;&#160;louieforever bookmarked on 01/19/08 &#124; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bookmarks tagged rank ReviewMe.com Sucks and Google Finally Gave Back So&#8230;&nbsp;saved by 1 others  &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;louieforever bookmarked on 01/19/08 | [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fabien of Small Fish Big Money</title>
		<link>http://www.joetech.com/2008/01/12/reviewmecom-sucks-and-google-finally-give-back-some-page-rank/comment-page-1/#comment-3491</link>
		<dc:creator>Fabien of Small Fish Big Money</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 11:45:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joetech.com/2008/01/12/reviewmecom-sucks-and-google-finally-give-back-some-page-rank/#comment-3491</guid>
		<description>My toolbar must be really stuffed cause I see PR0 but I checked Dig Pagerank and it is 3. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My toolbar must be really stuffed cause I see PR0 but I checked Dig Pagerank and it is 3. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mother&#8217;s Got A Dot Com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google&#8217;s Been At It Again</title>
		<link>http://www.joetech.com/2008/01/12/reviewmecom-sucks-and-google-finally-give-back-some-page-rank/comment-page-1/#comment-3489</link>
		<dc:creator>Mother&#8217;s Got A Dot Com &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Google&#8217;s Been At It Again</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joetech.com/2008/01/12/reviewmecom-sucks-and-google-finally-give-back-some-page-rank/#comment-3489</guid>
		<description>[...] read about the update on Joe Tech&#8217;s blog, and couldn&#8217;t help myself, I had to go and check. The last time I got a 3, was with my [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] read about the update on Joe Tech&#8217;s blog, and couldn&#8217;t help myself, I had to go and check. The last time I got a 3, was with my [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.joetech.com/2008/01/12/reviewmecom-sucks-and-google-finally-give-back-some-page-rank/comment-page-1/#comment-3460</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joetech.com/2008/01/12/reviewmecom-sucks-and-google-finally-give-back-some-page-rank/#comment-3460</guid>
		<description>Cameron: I&#039;m just happy to have some page rank back.  I&#039;m doing reviews, but I&#039;m not charging.  I can&#039;t justify charing enough to make it worth charging, so they&#039;re free reviews done as I have time to do them.  Also, making them free helps me make sure I am honest.  We&#039;re all human, after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cameron: I&#8217;m just happy to have some page rank back.  I&#8217;m doing reviews, but I&#8217;m not charging.  I can&#8217;t justify charing enough to make it worth charging, so they&#8217;re free reviews done as I have time to do them.  Also, making them free helps me make sure I am honest.  We&#8217;re all human, after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.joetech.com/2008/01/12/reviewmecom-sucks-and-google-finally-give-back-some-page-rank/comment-page-1/#comment-3459</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:37:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joetech.com/2008/01/12/reviewmecom-sucks-and-google-finally-give-back-some-page-rank/#comment-3459</guid>
		<description>Reno: That sucks!

Entrepreneur: I disagree with you 100%.  You can&#039;t honestly say that those sites with a high page rank are crap and low PR sites are good.  There are many factors that go into determining a sites Page Rank, most of which involve the site&#039;s perceived value to the web community.  I can&#039;t say I agree with all the Page Rank penalties, but I can say that I think it still serves as an indicator of site importance, even if it IS less accurate these days.

As for advertisers, I think they should (and will) re-evaluate their purchases.  Purchasing links (and selling) based on page rank is just not worth the effort and risk these days.  I like the 125x125 ads I sell because it offers the opportunity for my advertisers to get their link on my site and to get their logo in front of over 1,000 daily visitors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reno: That sucks!</p>
<p>Entrepreneur: I disagree with you 100%.  You can&#8217;t honestly say that those sites with a high page rank are crap and low PR sites are good.  There are many factors that go into determining a sites Page Rank, most of which involve the site&#8217;s perceived value to the web community.  I can&#8217;t say I agree with all the Page Rank penalties, but I can say that I think it still serves as an indicator of site importance, even if it IS less accurate these days.</p>
<p>As for advertisers, I think they should (and will) re-evaluate their purchases.  Purchasing links (and selling) based on page rank is just not worth the effort and risk these days.  I like the 125&#215;125 ads I sell because it offers the opportunity for my advertisers to get their link on my site and to get their logo in front of over 1,000 daily visitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://www.joetech.com/2008/01/12/reviewmecom-sucks-and-google-finally-give-back-some-page-rank/comment-page-1/#comment-3458</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:27:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joetech.com/2008/01/12/reviewmecom-sucks-and-google-finally-give-back-some-page-rank/#comment-3458</guid>
		<description>Webomatica: Thanks.  I would love to make $20k+/month like John Chow, but I&#039;m not him, so I should focus on content and growth and not so much on making the cash.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Webomatica: Thanks.  I would love to make $20k+/month like John Chow, but I&#8217;m not him, so I should focus on content and growth and not so much on making the cash.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
